Data collection vs. deterrence: the challenges of research on SLAPP cases

Strategic Lawsuits Against Public Participation, or SLAPP for short, are a growing problem for civil society. But how widespread are these intimidation lawsuits really? This seemingly simple question poses considerable challenges for researchers.

The greatest difficulty in collecting reliable data on SLAPP cases lies in the nature of these complaints themselves: They aim to silence critics. And unfortunately, they are often successful in doing so. Many victims who have been successfully intimidated are reluctant to speak out about their cases - especially not proactively or publicly. This leads to a serious lack of data that obscures the true dimension of the problem.

Trust is the key

In order to collect meaningful data on SLAPP cases, researchers must first overcome a hurdle: They must gain the trust of those affected. This is only possible if it is clear that it is not primarily about using their vulnerability for abstract studies, but about concrete help and support.

An important new study

In this context, a study that is currently underway is of particular relevance. Prof. Dr. Stephanie Egidy, in cooperation with the Otto Brenner Foundation, the Society for Civil Liberties, the Environmental Institute Munich and the German Journalists' Union in verdi (which is one of the cooperation partners of the No SLAPP Contact Point), is investigating the topic of "Strategic Lawsuits against Public Participation (SLAPPs) in Germany".

This study aims to provide a comprehensive picture of SLAPP procedures: How common are they? In which constellations do they occur? Who do they affect? What tactics do the plaintiffs use? And what consequences do they have for those affected?

Collecting reliable data on SLAPP cases is a challenge that can only be overcome through a sensitive, victim-centered approach. Initiatives such as the No SLAPP contact point and the current study by Prof. Dr. Egidy are important steps in this direction. They offer those affected not only support, but also a voice. Only in this way can we grasp the true extent of SLAPP procedures and develop effective counter-strategies.

Your participation in the study can help to make SLAPP procedures visible and combat them in the long term. Let's work together to protect freedom of expression and an open culture of debate.

Previous
Previous

SRA takes action against UK lawyer for alleged SLAPP

Next
Next

Statement from Ricochet-Refresh regarding recent stories in German media about alleged timing attacks affecting our users